Highlighting aircraft wing shapes (straight, swept, delta, variable geometry) and their advantages for each aeronautical application.

Aircraft wings play a major role in lift. Depending on their design, they can enhance speed, stability or maneuverability. Aircraft manufacturers choose a shape to suit their missions and constraints. The straight wing, often seen on light aircraft, offers a good balance between lift and manufacturing simplicity. The swept-wing design, widely used on modern aircraft, improves aerodynamics in high-speed flight. The delta profile, associated with many fighter aircraft, is appreciated for its high lift and high-speed stability. Finally, variable geometry offers a compromise between fast flight and low-speed control, although this solution involves more complex mechanisms.

Choosing the right wing shape requires a careful study of operational requirements. Engineers analyze cruise speed, thrust requirements and desired maneuverability. Fighter aircraft, for example, prefer a design that favors responsiveness. Passenger aircraft prefer a design that limits drag, to reduce fuel consumption.

There’s more to aircraft wings than their overall shape. The essential dihedral, aspect ratio and lifting devices complete the approach. Understanding these parameters helps us to understand why each category of aircraft adopts a particular geometry. Whether commercial airliners, military aircraft or advanced prototypes, the aim is always to achieve efficiency and safety in flight. This introduction offers a general overview of the different shapes, before detailing their characteristics, advantages and limitations.

1. Technical framework

1.1 Basic principles of lift

Lift is a force generated by the interaction between a wing and the airflow passing through it. It acts perpendicularly to the relative airflow and compensates for the weight of the aircraft. This phenomenon is explained by the pressure difference between the upper surface (upper part of the wing) and the lower surface (lower part).

When air flows over the top surface, it undergoes acceleration due to the curvature of the wing profile, creating a lower pressure. On the lower surface, the flow is slowed, resulting in higher pressure. This pressure difference generates lift, which is proportional to several factors: wing area, relative speed, air density, and the lift coefficient linked to profile and angle of attack.

Beyond a critical angle (often between 15° and 20° depending on the profile), lift decreases abruptly due to stall, caused by airflow separation on the upper surface.

1.2 Influence of profile and aspect ratio

The wing profile determines aerodynamic performance. A thick airfoil, often used on light aircraft, favors high lift at low speeds, but generates high drag. Thin airfoils, common on fast aircraft, reduce drag but require high speeds to generate sufficient lift.

aspect ratio (wingspan divided by mean chord) also influences flight characteristics. A high aspect ratio, typical of gliders (greater than 15), reduces induced drag, optimizing efficiency for extended flights. Conversely, a low aspect ratio (often below 6) improves handling and structural robustness, an essential criterion for fighter aircraft such as the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor.

Devices such as winglets, placed at the wingtips, reduce marginal vortices, lowering induced drag and increasing overall wing efficiency, particularly on long-haul aircraft.

2. Straight wing

2.1 Advantages and limitations

The straight wing is characterized by an orientation perpendicular to the fuselage, giving the wing geometric and structural simplicity. This configuration optimizes lift at low speeds, thanks to a large wing area and low induced drag. It is particularly suited to low-altitude flights at moderate speeds, where air turbulence is limited.

However, at high speeds (in excess of Mach 0.4, i.e. around 490 km/h), the straight wing becomes ineffective due to increased aerodynamic drag. At these speeds, the airflow around the wings tends to produce shock waves, considerably increasing drag and reducing fuel efficiency. This constraint makes the straight wing unsuitable for aircraft designed for high-speed transport or cruise missions.

In addition, straight wings are subject to greater structural stresses at high speeds, which can limit their maximum allowable load. They are therefore better suited to aircraft where simplicity of design, light weight and low-speed maneuverability are priorities.

2.2 Examples of civil applications

The straight-wing is commonly used on light, multi-purpose aircraft. The Cessna 172, one of the world’s most mass-produced aircraft, illustrates this configuration. With a cruising speed of around 230 km/h, this aircraft benefits from the advantages of a straight-wing configuration, including excellent lift at low speeds and maneuverability suitable for pilot training.

Agricultural aircraft, such as the Air Tractor AT-802, also exploit this configuration for specific missions requiring low-level flight and precise maneuvering. The simplified design of these wings reduces production costs, facilitates maintenance and enables use in demanding operational environments.

On the other hand, for applications requiring high cruising speeds or heavier loads, such as commercial or military jets, this configuration is replaced by more suitable designs, such as swept or delta wings.

3. Soaring wing

3.1 Historical evolution

The swept wing is an aerodynamic innovation developed in the late 1930s and perfected during the Second World War. The first detailed studies were carried out by the German engineer Adolf Busemann, who demonstrated that tilting the wings reduced drag at transonic speeds (Mach 0.8 to Mach 1.2).

The first concrete applications appeared on military aircraft, such as the Messerschmitt Me 262, designed to reduce wave drag, which is the increased aerodynamic resistance caused by the appearance of shock waves near the speed of sound. After the war, these concepts were taken up and perfected by the USA and the USSR, notably on aircraft such as the North American F-86 Sabre and the Mikoyan-Gourevitch MiG-15.

Over the decades, the swept wing has been adopted by civil and military aircraft requiring optimum performance at high speed. Today, it remains the standard for airliners and subsonic and supersonic fighters.

3.2 High-speed performance benefits

The main characteristic of a swept wing is its backward inclination in relation to the axis perpendicular to the fuselage. This angle, generally between 15° and 45°, reduces the perpendicular component of the relative speed of the air meeting the leading edge. This decreases the likelihood of shockwave formation and reduces wave drag, significantly improving efficiency at high speeds.

Long-haul commercial aircraft, such as the Boeing 747 or the Airbus A350, use this configuration to maintain high cruising speeds, often close to Mach 0.85 (around 900 km/h). This configuration also optimizes fuel consumption by minimizing drag, essential for long-haul flights.

In military aviation, aircraft such as the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II and the Dassault Mirage 2000 exploit the swept-wing configuration to combine high speed and maneuverability, while reducing their radar signature compared with more conventional shapes.

However, the swept wing has certain limitations at low speeds, where it generates less lift than a straight wing. To overcome this problem, devices such as slats and flaps are frequently incorporated to increase lift during take-off and landing.

4. Delta configuration

4.1 Military aviation highlights

The delta configuration is characterized by a high-sweep, isosceles-triangular wing, with or without tailplane. This geometry offers several advantages that make it a preferred choice for military aircraft. It maximizes wing area while maintaining a robust structure capable of withstanding high loads. This design is particularly well suited to fast maneuvers, where high instantaneous lift is required.

At high speeds, the delta configuration excels thanks to its ability to reduce wave drag, an essential criterion for supersonic aircraft. The triangular design also makes it possible to integrate a thinner, more resistant wing, thus reducing the structural stresses associated with speed.

Military aircraft such as the Dassault Mirage III and the Saab Viggen exploit this configuration for their air combat performance. The Mirage III, for example, can reach Mach 2.2 thanks to its delta wing, which combines high lift with aerodynamic efficiency. What’s more, this shape is ideal for short take-offs and rapid climbs, essential features in demanding operational environments.

4.2 Aerodynamic adaptations

Delta wings allow high angles of attack, favorable for complex maneuvers. This behavior is made possible by the formation of stable vortices along the upper surface, which maintain lift even at angles where other configurations stall. This phenomenon is exploited on aircraft such as the Concorde, which uses a modified delta wing to guarantee stability and lift at supersonic speeds.

However, this configuration has its limitations at low speeds, where induced drag increases due to the large wing area. To compensate for this shortcoming, devices such as hypersuspension flaps and movable slats are integrated. These systems increase the curvature and effective surface area of the wing, reducing stall speed and improving take-off and landing performance.

In addition, aircraft equipped with delta wings, such as the Eurofighter Typhoon, often use additional control surfaces, such as canards located at the front of the fuselage. These elements enhance maneuverability, stability and responsiveness in demanding flight conditions.

This configuration remains a relevant technical choice for military aircraft requiring optimized performance in terms of speed, maneuverability and versatility in varied operating environments.

5. Variable geometry

5.1 Angle-change mechanisms

Variable geometry** refers to a wing configuration capable of modifying its sweep angle in flight. This system relies on mechanical joints and hydraulic or electric actuators to move the wings relative to their fuselage mounting. In the extended position (wings straight), lift is maximized, ideal for low-speed flight phases such as take-off and landing. In the folded position (swept wings), wave drag is reduced, optimizing high-speed performance.

An emblematic example of this technology is the General Dynamics F-111 Aardvark, whose wings could go from a minimum sweep of 16° to a maximum sweep of 72.5° depending on the phase of flight. This capability enabled the F-111 to excel in missions requiring a variety of characteristics, such as supersonic flight or low-speed approaches.

Another notable example is the Grumman F-14 Tomcat, which used an automatic control system to adjust the boom angle in real time according to aerodynamic requirements. This flexibility gave the aircraft a tactical advantage in aerial combat, combining maneuverability and high speed.

5.2 Maintenance implications

Variable geometry implies considerable mechanical complexity. Articulation mechanisms and actuators have to withstand high loads, particularly in supersonic flight, while maintaining sufficient structural rigidity to avoid deformation. These components, subject to repetitive forces and wear, require frequent and rigorous maintenance to guarantee their reliability.

The additional weight introduced by these systems also affects overall aircraft performance, increasing fuel consumption compared with fixed configurations. For example, the F-111’s variable geometry system added several hundred kilograms to the aircraft’s structure, requiring a more powerful engine to compensate.

Maintenance costs are also higher, as moving mechanisms need to be inspected regularly and replaced more frequently than fixed-wing components. This complexity explains why variable geometry has been gradually abandoned in favor of modern designs, such as swept wings optimized for specific speeds, or hybrid configurations using advanced materials to combine lightness and rigidity.

Despite its drawbacks, variable geometry marked a milestone in the history of aerodynamics, enabling us to push back the limits of flight performance in demanding operational contexts.

6. Additional parameters

6.1 Dihedral and stability

The dihedral is the angle formed between the wing and a horizontal plane passing through the fuselage. A positive dihedral**, where the wingtips are higher than the fuselage, improves lateral stability. This phenomenon is based on the torque effect: in the event of an unexpected lateral tilt (due to turbulence, for example), the lowered wing produces greater lift thanks to increased airflow, helping the aircraft to return to a balanced position.

Airliners, such as the Airbus A320, use a moderate dihedral (typically between 3° and 5°) to provide satisfactory stability without compromising aerodynamic performance. On the other hand, fighter aircraft such as the McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle may have no dihedral or even a negative dihedral (wingtips lower than the attachment point) to enhance maneuverability, to the detriment of automatic stability.

The choice of dihedral is therefore a technical compromise between stability, maneuverability and aerodynamic efficiency, depending on the specific needs of the aircraft.

6.2 High-lift devices and controls

High-lift devices increase a wing’s lift by modifying its airfoil or surface during critical phases of flight, such as take-off and landing. These systems play a key role in lowering the stall speed and reducing the distance required for ground operations.

Flaps are the most common devices. They deploy from the trailing edge of the wing, increasing the camber and sometimes the effective wing area. Fowler flaps, used on the Boeing 737, slide aft before lowering, increasing both lift and control. These devices enable airliners to maintain a high payload while operating on shorter runways.

The leading edge beams, on the other hand, deploy at the front of the wing to prevent stalling by increasing the maximum angle of attack. The Airbus A380, for example, uses these slats for its take-off and approach phases, combined with multi-segment flaps to optimize aerodynamics.

Finally, spoilers, although primarily designed to reduce lift and increase drag, also contribute to lateral control by enabling differential roll. These devices offer pilots precise control during complex approaches or landings on slippery runways.

High lift systems are essential for maximizing aircraft safety and performance, while meeting the operational constraints of modern airports.

7. Selection factors

7.1 Mission, cruising speed and type of operation

The choice of wing shape depends on the aircraft’s mission. Fighter aircraft, for example, prefer a configuration optimized for high-speed maneuverability, such as the delta wing or swept wings. On the other hand, passenger aircraft, such as the Boeing 787 or the Airbus A350, adopt swept wings to maximize efficiency at high cruising speeds, often around Mach 0.85 (around 900 km/h).

For light aircraft or those designed for specific missions, such as agricultural spraying or observation flights, the straight wing is a common choice. This configuration offers good lift and facilitates low-speed operations, often below 200 km/h.

7.2 Fuel consumption and profitability

Commercial aircraft, subject to strict economic constraints, require drag-reducing wings to limit fuel consumption. A well-designed wing can reduce fuel consumption by several percent, saving thousands of liters of fuel per flight. For example, wingtip modifications such as winglets can reduce induced drag and save up to 4% fuel on long-haul flights.

8. Trends at a glance

8.1 Innovations in future fighter aircraft

Recent projects in military aviation are exploring hybrid configurations. For example, concepts combining delta wings with advanced aerodynamic surfaces, such as canards, aim to improve maneuverability and reduce radar signature. The Dassault Rafale and the Sukhoi Su-57 are examples of aircraft incorporating these innovations.

8.2 Experimental concepts in civil aviation

In civil aviation, research is focusing on flying wings, where the entire aircraft structure contributes to lift. This concept promises to considerably reduce drag and increase transport capacity. The Airbus ZeroE, a hydrogen-powered aircraft project, envisages the integration of revolutionary wing shapes to meet the need for energy efficiency and autonomy.

Get in touch to fly a fighter jet – we fly in France AND YOU CAN TAKE THE CONTROLS!!!