Detailed analysis of China’s A2/AD strategy, how it works, its military implications and its strategic impact in the Asia-Pacific.

China’s A2/AD (Anti-Access/Area Denial) strategy aims to limit the ability of opposing forces to access and deny them use of strategic areas in the Asia-Pacific. By combining advanced coastal defence systems, ballistic missiles, naval and air forces, China seeks to deter outside intervention, particularly by the United States, in its areas of interest, such as the South China Sea. This strategy relies on a sophisticated military infrastructure and increased technological capacity, challenging the traditional supremacy of Western forces in the region. This article explores the technical details of this strategy, its implications for regional and global security, and its future prospects.

What is the A2/AD strategy?

China’s Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) strategy is a set of military capabilities designed to prevent an adversary from entering a specific area (anti-access) and to limit the adversary’s freedom of action in that area (area denial). The main objective of this strategy is to reduce the power projection of the United States and its allies in the Asia-Pacific region. In simple terms, China is seeking to make military operations by foreign forces costly, difficult or even impossible in areas considered crucial to its national interests.

This strategy is based on several key elements. Anti-ship ballistic missiles (such as the DF-21D and DF-26) play a central role in China’s anti-access capability. These missiles, nicknamed ‘aircraft carrier killers’, have the ability to strike moving targets at long range, up to 3,000 kilometres for the DF-26, endangering warships approaching the Chinese coast.

At the same time, China’s air and naval forces have been considerably strengthened, with advanced platforms such as J-20 fighters, Type 055 destroyers, and Yuan-class submarines, all designed to operate in a high-intensity environment and to counter opposing forces. The modernisation of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) over the past two decades, including the construction of militarised artificial islands in the South China Sea, has also enhanced China’s A2/AD capability.

A2/AD is not limited to offensive capabilities alone. Integrated air defence systems (such as the HQ-9 and S-400) and electronic warfare capabilities complement this strategy by neutralising air attacks and disrupting enemy communications.

Military implications of the A2/AD strategy

China’s adoption of the A2/AD strategy has profound implications for military dynamics in the Asia-Pacific region. This strategy challenges US maritime supremacy, traditionally assured by its fleet of aircraft carriers, by making these platforms vulnerable to long-range strikes. The United States has long dominated the seas with naval air groups capable of projecting its power anywhere in the world. However, Chinese ballistic missiles such as the DF-21D, capable of striking an aircraft carrier from hundreds of kilometres away, pose a direct threat to this doctrine.

In addition, A2/AD is forcing the United States and its allies to rethink their engagement strategies. The proliferation of China’s advanced defence systems is forcing foreign forces to operate at greater distances, reducing their effectiveness and increasing the complexity of operations. The concept of the ‘A2/AD bubble ’ refers to an area in which US forces can only operate at high risk due to Chinese capabilities.

This situation has led to military exercises and simulations by the Pentagon to develop new doctrines and technologies capable of piercing A2/AD defences. For example, the Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) concept aims to integrate all branches of the US armed forces into a single network capable of responding to threats in a coordinated and rapid manner.

The United States’ regional allies, such as Japan and Australia, are also concerned about the rise of the Chinese A2/AD. They have begun to strengthen their own military capabilities, including the purchase of missile defence systems and improvements to their submarine capabilities, to counter the Chinese threat.

Strategic and geopolitical consequences

The geopolitical consequences of the A2/AD strategy are far-reaching. China’s ultimate objective is to redefine the regional order in the Asia-Pacific by minimising the United States’ ability to intervene militarily in its areas of interest, particularly in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. By establishing a robust A2/AD capability, China seeks to deter any US military intervention in these regions, thereby ensuring a dominant strategic position.

This also has an impact on international relations in the region. ASEAN countries, although some are US allies, are increasingly cautious in their relations with Beijing, knowing that China has the capacity to coerce them militarily. This situation has led some countries to seek a delicate balance between maintaining a secure relationship with the United States while avoiding provoking China.

The A2/AD strategy is also influencing the arms race in the region. China’s rise in military power is pushing its neighbours, such as Japan, South Korea and India, to modernise their armed forces. Japan recently announced significant increases in its defence budget, aimed in particular at strengthening its missile defence capabilities and acquiring new naval and air platforms to counter the Chinese A2/AD threat.

In global terms, the A2/AD is contributing to a multiplication of points of tension in the Asia-Pacific region, with implications for global security. The strengthening of China’s military capabilities and the A2/AD strategy increase the risk of a regional arms race and military incidents that could degenerate into wider conflicts.

Future prospects for the A2/AD strategy

The future of China’s A2/AD strategy will largely depend on technological developments and the strategic responses of other powers. The technological arms race in the field of artificial intelligence, drones and hypersonic systems could either strengthen the A2/AD strategy or render it obsolete if new effective countermeasures are developed.

In addition, China continues to improve its capabilities in space and cyberspace, which could extend the reach of A2/AD beyond the physical domain, including potential attacks on adversary command and control networks. The integration of these technologies into the A2/AD strategy could create an even more complex environment for foreign military forces, requiring them to develop multi-domain approaches to counter these threats.

A2/AD, while crucial to China’s defence strategy, could also have its limits. The ability of the United States to develop disruptive technologies, such as directed energy weapons or space defence systems, could potentially neutralise some of the advantages of China’s A2/AD. In addition, regional diplomacy and alliances will continue to play a key role in the Asia-Pacific balance of power.

Finally, the evolution of the A2/AD strategy will also depend on China’s long-term political objectives. If Beijing continues to focus on protecting its territorial interests, the A2/AD will probably remain a pillar of its military strategy. On the other hand, if China adopts a more aggressive posture on the world stage, it may have to adjust or extend this strategy to deal with potential adversaries beyond the Asia-Pacific.

Want to fly a fighter jet ? Get in touch.