
The criteria used by the US Air Force to assess fighter pilots during Red Flag exercises
10 April 2025How fighter pilots maintain their operations without GPS: alternative systems, manual techniques and training to deal with jamming.
Modern fighter planes, such as the F-22 or the Rafale, rely on GPS for formidable precision in their missions. This satellite system ensures positioning with an error of less than 3 meters, essential for targeted strikes or low altitude flights. However, current threats, particularly electromagnetic jamming, make GPS vulnerable. In 2023, fighter pilots operating near the Black Sea reported signal losses for more than 30 minutes, caused by Russian systems such as Krasukha-4. These disruptions, sometimes extending over 200 kilometers, expose a major strategic weakness. The air forces must therefore guarantee the continuity of operations without this technology. This article details the technical and human solutions implemented by fighter pilots to compensate for this failure. It is aimed at experts in the field, exploring on-board systems, manual methods and specific training. Figures and real-life examples illustrate a harsh reality: dependence on GPS is a risk, and the alternatives require skill and robustness.
Backup systems in fighter planes
The inertial measurement unit as an autonomous base
Fighter planes incorporate inertial measurement units (IMUs) to operate without GPS. These devices, equipped with fiber optic gyroscopes and accelerometers, calculate position by measuring movements from an initial point. For example, the INS of the F-35 offers an accuracy of 0.8 kilometers after 1 hour of flight without recalibration. But the drift accumulates: it reaches 1.5 to 3 kilometers per hour depending on the conditions. To limit this, barometric sensors adjust the altitude with a margin of 15 meters.
Radar recalibration and terrain following
The TERCOM (Terrain Contour Matching) radar compares the terrain being flown over with an on-board database. On a British Typhoon, this system reduces positional error to 80 meters in known terrain. In 2022, a French fighter pilot used this method in Mali, finding his way back after 45 minutes of jamming. Infrared pods, such as the LITENING, also identify visual landmarks to within 20 meters, even at night.
Redundancy of on-board computers
The computers ensure a smooth transition between GPS and alternative systems. The F-16 has two independent units that switch to the INS in 0.3 seconds if the GPS is lost. This redundancy costs around €10,000 per annual maintenance, but it avoids critical failures. These technologies, although reliable, require up-to-date databases and strict calibration before each mission.
The manual techniques of fighter pilots
The use of the stars for orientation
Without electronic tools, fighter pilots resort to celestial navigation. A modern sextant, accurate to within ±5 kilometers with a star like Sirius, is sometimes carried on board. In 2021, a Mirage 2000 pilot over the Libyan desert corrected his trajectory in this way, landing 120 kilometers from his planned base. This method requires a clear sky and a level of control that is rare today.
Landmarks as a guide
Paper maps and magnetic compasses remain allies. Pilots memorize distinctive features – bridges, lakes, power lines – before takeoff. During an exercise in 2023, an American F/A-18 followed a highway for 300 kilometers without GPS, with a deviation of 2 degrees. This technique requires flying at a lower altitude of 150 meters, increasing the risks.
The link with the ground for adjustments
VHF radios, which are not affected by satellite interference, connect pilots to bases. A controller can triangulate a position to within ±3 kilometers using fixed transmitters. In 2024, a French Rafale, lost near Kaliningrad, was guided over 180 kilometers by this method. The range, limited to 250 kilometers, remains a constraining factor. These manual approaches rely on experience and meticulous preparation, far from modern automation.


The rigorous preparation of fighter pilots
GPS failure simulations
Pilots train on simulators that reproduce scenarios without GPS. The US Navy imposes 4 annual sessions of 2 hours, costing €8,000 per pilot. In a test in 2023, 85% of the participants maintained an accuracy of 4 kilometers over 1 hour. These exercises include simulated jamming and multiple failures.
Flying in a hostile environment
Real-life exercises, such as Black Crow 24 in France, use jammers over a distance of 200 kilometers. A Rafale flew for 90 minutes without GPS, relying on INS and TERCOM, with a final error of 3 kilometers. Each flight costs €45,000, but it validates skills under pressure.
Stress resistance
The loss of GPS overloads the pilot: he has to manage heading, speed and altitude manually. Physical training – €3,000 per year – strengthens endurance under 7 Gs. A 2022 study shows that 95% of trained pilots remain effective after 2 hours without GPS. This preparation is essential: an untrained pilot risks total disorientation in 20 minutes.
The challenges and operational realities
The impact of enemy jamming
GPS jamming is a common weapon. In 2023, near Ukraine, Russian systems disrupted F-35s over a distance of 150 kilometers, with drifts of 50 kilometers. These attacks cost little – €5,000 per jammer – but paralyze modern operations.
The flaws of the alternatives
The INS drifts, and the TERCOM fails without precise maps. An Indian Su-30, lost in 2021 in Kashmir, flew over an enemy zone due to lack of terrain data, almost causing a diplomatic incident. These limitations expose a dependence on digital infrastructures.
Costs and priorities
Equipping a fighter plane with an advanced INS costs €1.2 million. With defense budgets stretched – €50 billion for France in 2025 – the choices are tough. Some experts believe that 15% of the funds should target resilience to jamming. The reality is clear: without investment, fighter pilots remain at the mercy of enemy countermeasures.
Get in touch to live a unique fighter jet experience – we fly in France AND YOU CAN TAKE THE CONTROLS!!!