Analysis of the lessons learned from the MiG-29 by Russia and their influence on the design of subsequent fighters, with a focus on technological advances.

The MiG-29, introduced in the 1980s, marked a significant milestone in Soviet military aviation. Designed to compete with Western fighters such as the F-16, it enabled the Soviet Union to maintain technological parity in the air domain. The experience gained during its development and operational use offered Russian engineers valuable insights for the design of subsequent generations of fighter aircraft. This article explores the specific lessons learned from the MiG-29 and their application in subsequent programs.

The contribution of the MiG-29 to the evolution of Russian fighter planes

The MiG-29 Fulcrum, designed by the Mikoyan office from 1974 and introduced into service in 1983, had to meet precise specifications: to intercept and neutralize Western fighters such as the F-15, F-16 or Mirage 2000. The USSR wanted a light fighter aircraft, capable of operating close to the front line, while being sufficiently powerful to counter fourth-generation threats. Its development led to several major technical findings, which influenced the design of subsequent generations of aircraft, from the MiG-29SMT to the Su-35S, via the MiG-35.

Design and performance

The MiG-29 is equipped with two Klimov RD-33 turbojet engines, each developing a thrust of 5,040 kgf dry and 8,300 kgf with afterburner (i.e. 81.4 kN). The combined thrust therefore amounts to 16,600 kgf, for a maximum take-off weight of 18,000 kg, which gives a thrust/weight ratio of 0.92. This twin-engine design improves operational reliability in the event of engine failure, but entails additional maintenance costs (up to 35% higher than the single-engine F-16 according to reports at the time) and increased fuel consumption.

The MiG-29 has a maximum speed of Mach 2.25 (2,400 km/h at altitude) and an operational ceiling of 18,000 meters. Its range in standard configuration without refueling is limited to 1,430 km with internal tanks, which has restricted its use to bases close to the theater of operations.

These data prompted engineers to integrate new solutions in the following models from the 1990s onwards: compliant tanks, in-flight refueling, longer-lasting engines (up to 4,000 hours for the RD-33MK, compared to 2,000 hours for the first RD-33s).

Maneuverability and close combat

The MiG-29 was designed for high-incidence maneuverability, thanks to careful aerodynamics, optimized side air intakes, and a more rigid titanium structure. It achieves a maximum load factor of +9G, with a roll rate of 270°/second. Its swept wing combined with high control surfaces allows it to maintain excellent stability up to an angle of attack of 28°.

Its maneuverability is supported by a high thrust-to-weight ratio, favoring spinning combat. This tactical choice has yielded results in close engagements, but has shown its limitations against Western systems capable of beyond-visual-range (BVR) engagements.

This experience led to the upgrading of the aircraft with helmet-mounted sighting systems (Shchel-3UM) and the integration of the R-73 (AA-11 Archer) missile, coupled with an IR tracking system, the OEPS-29, offering a passive detection range of up to 45 km. These capabilities have been incorporated and enhanced in future models, particularly via external optronic pods and new-generation missiles (R-77M with a range of 200 km on the Su-57).

Avionics and weapons systems

The N019 Sapfir-29 radar, in X-band, with a mechanical antenna, had a maximum range of 70 km against a target of 3 m² (F-16 type), and a tracking capacity of 10 targets with simultaneous engagement on 2. However, it suffered from low resistance to jamming (ECCM) and poor tracking at low altitude. Furthermore, it was not fully compatible with modern communication systems (lack of standardized tactical data link).

The main armament of the MiG-29 consisted of a 30 mm GSh-30-1 cannon with 150 shells, and 6 hardpoints that could accommodate R-60 (AA-8), R-27 (AA-10) air-to-air missiles or conventional guided bombs. The lack of a modern digital interface, however, limited the versatility of this ammunition.

These shortcomings led to the gradual modernization of the Fulcrum into the SMT, K, and then MiG-35 variants, incorporating the Zhuk-ME radar (range of 160 km, tracking of 30 targets, engagement of 6 simultaneously), a full-screen cockpit (15-inch color MFD), and a full multirole capability.

Application of lessons learned from the MiG-29 in subsequent developments

The experience gained with the MiG-29 has directly influenced the design of modern Russian fighters. From the 2000s, the need to correct the weaknesses of the Fulcrum prompted Mikoyan to develop improved versions (MiG-29SMT, MiG-29K) before proposing a complete overhaul with the MiG-35. These developments also indirectly influenced the development of the Su-30SM, Su-35S and the future Su-75 Checkmate.

The MiG-35: a redesign geared towards network-centric warfare

The MiG-35 (NATO code: Fulcrum-F) is a direct evolution of the MiG-29, reinstating certain airframe structures, but profoundly redesigned to incorporate the standards of multi-domain warfare.

It is equipped with two Klimov RD-33MK engines, derived from the RD-33 but with increased thrust of 9,000 kgf each, or 18,000 kgf in total (176.5 kN), a lifespan extended to 4,000 hours, and a reduced infrared signature. The MiG-35 thus surpasses the MiG-29 in climb capacity (330 m/s against 285 m/s) and can reach Mach 2.23, with a combat radius extended to 1,000 km without an external tank, i.e. 40% more than the MiG-29.

The on-board Zhuk-AE radar with AESA antenna can detect a typical fighter at 160 km and simultaneously track 30 targets, engaging 6 of them. This system advantageously replaces the mechanical N019 radar of the old Fulcrum, and is interfaced with NATO-compatible tactical data links.

The MiG-35 can also carry up to 6 tons of payload on 9 hardpoints, with a range including R-77-1, R-73, Kh-31, Kh-38 missiles, as well as KAB-500 guided bombs. The cockpit incorporates two 15-inch multifunction displays, a digital interface with HOTAS controls and an optical infrared detection system (OLS-UEM) capable of locating a target at 50 km without radar emission.

Priority given to operational versatility

The MiG-29 was strictly optimized for short-range air superiority. This functional compartmentalization limited its strategic capabilities. In contrast, the MiG-35 was designed from the outset as a multirole fighter aircraft, integrating the ability to strike land, naval and air targets.

It can engage a moving ground target at 60 km with a Kh-38MLE guided missile, or hit an enemy radar with a Kh-31PD at 110 km. It is also compatible with laser reconnaissance and designation pods, such as the T220/E, and incorporates an L-150 Pastel active jamming system, increasing its electronic warfare capabilities.

This modular approach is in line with the doctrinal changes imposed by recent conflicts in Syria, Ukraine and Georgia. Russian forces need aircraft capable of simultaneously handling multiple engagements on dispersed fronts, something the MiG-29 could not do effectively.

Increased autonomy and logistical rationalization

The limited range of the MiG-29 (around 700 km on air-to-air missions) was one of the factors in its operational decommissioning. The MiG-35 has increased internal fuel tanks (4,800 liters compared with 3,600 for the MiG-29), and an in-flight refueling boom compatible with the Russian Il-78 Midas. On interdiction missions, it can operate at 1,500 km with two external tanks.

In terms of logistics, the integration of on-board diagnostics (BIT – Built-In Test Equipment) has reduced preventive maintenance operations by 27%, and increased operational availability to 85%, compared with 60 to 65% for the MiG-29 in the 1990s. The basic maintenance cycle has been increased to 500 flight hours, with an estimated service life of 6,000 hours or 40 years.

The estimated unit cost of the MiG-35 is 42 million euros, or about 45 million USD, compared to 22 million euros for a MiG-29SMT, which places it in an attractive intermediate cost range for customers such as India, Egypt or Algeria. The choice of an aircraft with a known airframe but fully modernized aims to reduce the costs of logistical transition and training (the compatibility between simulators is greater than 90%).

The MiG-29 served as a cornerstone in the evolution of Russian fighter aviation. The lessons learned from its development and use were crucial in guiding the technical and operational improvements of subsequent models. By addressing the challenges identified with the MiG-29, Russian engineers succeeded in designing more efficient and versatile fighters adapted to the contemporary requirements of air combat.

Get in touch to live a unique fighter jet experience – we fly in France AND YOU CAN TAKE THE CONTROLS!!!